Skip to content

anthropomorphism

PsychologyResearch methodsSocial cognitionAnimal behavior

Summary

Anthropomorphism is attributing human traits, emotions, or intentions to nonhuman animals, objects, or natural events. The testable point is that it is an interpretive bias in studying animal behavior, so researchers describe observable behavior rather than assuming human-like mental states.

Detail

Meaning: Anthropomorphism is reading human characteristics into things that are not human. Examples include saying a dog looks guilty, a chimpanzee is smiling because it is happy, or a storm is angry. It comes from our habit of using our own minds and social expectations (theory of mind, social schemas) to explain the behavior of other agents. It is an interpretive error risk, not a proven error: some animals do share behaviors and emotional states with humans, but the inference needs evidence.

On the MCAT: A passage describes a researcher interpreting animal behavior, such as a dog's "guilty" posture or a primate's facial expression. Questions ask you to spot the bias, or to choose a design that reduces it. Typical fixes are operational definitions of behavior (for example, "ears back, tail lowered" instead of "ashamed"), blind or independent observers, and controlled experiments that test the explanation. The term can also appear in discussions of how people attribute intentions to objects, such as robots or moving shapes.

Common confusion: Students mix it up with projection, a defense mechanism in which a person attributes their own unacceptable impulses to others. They also confuse it with anthropocentrism, which treats humans as the center of importance. Anthropomorphism is specifically giving human traits to nonhumans.

Sources

  • Psychology (Myers)
  • Psychology (Schacter, Gilbert, Wegner)

Written for the MCAT and checked before it was published. For study reference only. Spotted an error? Let us know.