coercive organization
Summary
A coercive organization secures compliance mainly through force or the threat of it, and its members usually did not choose to join. Prisons are the standard example. The testable point is the contrast with utilitarian organizations (pay) and normative organizations (shared values).
Detail
Meaning: In Etzioni's typology, formal organizations are sorted by the kind of power used to gain members' compliance. A coercive organization relies on physical force or the threat of punishment, and members are typically placed in it involuntarily, as in prisons. The other two types are utilitarian organizations, which rely on material rewards (a company paying wages), and normative organizations, which rely on shared goals and moral commitment (a church, a volunteer group). Coercive organizations often overlap with Goffman's total institutions, where residents are cut off from wider society and daily life is tightly controlled by staff.
On the MCAT: A passage describes an institution and asks you to classify it. Ask why members take part: forced means coercive, paid means utilitarian, belief in the mission means normative. Questions may also link coercive settings to resocialization, in which staff try to replace an old identity with a new one.
Common confusion: Students label any strict, hierarchical or rule-heavy organization as coercive. Strictness and bureaucracy are not the criterion. The basis of compliance is. A workforce that joins voluntarily and stays for pay points to utilitarian, while compliance under threat of punishment points to coercive, even within similar-looking institutions.
Sources
- Sociology (Macionis)
- Essentials of Sociology (Giddens)
- Sociology: A Brief Introduction (Schaefer)
Written for the MCAT and checked before it was published. For study reference only. Spotted an error? Let us know.