generativity vs. stagnation
Summary
In Erikson's psychosocial theory, generativity vs. stagnation is the crisis of middle adulthood: contributing to and guiding the next generation (generativity) versus self-absorption and feeling unproductive (stagnation). Testable point: it is stage 7, between intimacy vs. isolation and integrity vs. despair.
Detail
Meaning: Generativity vs. stagnation is the seventh stage of Erikson's psychosocial development, associated with middle adulthood. Each Erikson stage is a crisis between two opposing outcomes. Generativity is a concern for guiding and contributing to the next generation and society, through parenting, mentoring, teaching, productive work, or community service. Stagnation is self-absorption and a sense of being unproductive or disconnected from others' growth. Healthy resolution leans toward generativity, and Erikson linked it to the virtue of care.
On the MCAT: A vignette describes a midlife adult who mentors younger colleagues, coaches, or volunteers (generativity), or one who feels unproductive and self-focused (stagnation), and asks which stage or outcome is shown. Questions may also test the order of the stages: intimacy vs. isolation comes just before, and integrity vs. despair comes just after.
Common confusion: Generativity is not limited to parenting. A childless person who mentors others or creates something lasting can resolve this stage well. Stagnation is also not despair. Despair belongs to late adulthood and is regret over a life already lived, while stagnation is a lack of contribution in midlife. The person's life stage and the focus on the next generation settle which stage is described.
Sources
- Psychology (Myers)
- Development Through the Lifespan (Berk)
- Discovering Psychology (Hockenbury)
Written for the MCAT and checked before it was published. For study reference only. Spotted an error? Let us know.