Skip to content

ventilation-perfusion scan

Pulmonology / Diagnostic Imaging (Nuclear Medicine)RespiratoryCardiovascularHematology

Summary

A V/Q scan is a nuclear medicine study that compares regional lung ventilation (inhaled radiotracer, e.g., Xe-133 or Tc-99m aerosol/DTPA) with perfusion (IV Tc-99m macroaggregated albumin). A "mismatch" (ventilated but not perfused segments) suggests pulmonary embolism (PE). It is used when CT pulmonary angiography (CTPA) is contraindicated (renal insufficiency, contrast allergy, pregnancy) and is most useful when the chest X-ray is normal.

Detail

**Technique** - Perfusion: IV Tc-99m macroaggregated albumin (MAA) particles lodge in pulmonary capillaries and arterioles in proportion to blood flow. Gamma camera images show the distribution of flow. - Ventilation: the patient inhales a radiotracer (Xe-133 gas, or Tc-99m DTPA or Technegas aerosol). Images show the distribution of airflow. - The two sets of images are compared segment by segment. A chest X-ray is always obtained to help interpret the results.

**Interpretation** - Normal: homogeneous uptake on both ventilation and perfusion. This effectively rules out PE (high negative predictive value). - High probability (PE): one or more segmental or larger **mismatched** defects. Perfusion is absent but ventilation is preserved, so V/Q is high in that region (dead-space-like physiology). - Matched defects (both ventilation and perfusion reduced): seen in COPD, pneumonia, atelectasis, pulmonary edema, effusion, and mucus plugging. Hypoxic vasoconstriction reduces perfusion in poorly ventilated areas. These are low or intermediate probability for PE. - Indeterminate: intermediate-probability results need further testing (CTPA, lower extremity duplex, clinical pretest probability).

**Pathophysiology** - PE blocks blood flow to ventilated alveoli, which raises dead space and the V/Q ratio (V/Q → ∞ with complete obstruction). This causes hypoxemia and a widened A–a gradient. - Airway obstruction or consolidation lowers V/Q toward 0 (shunt). This is the opposite of PE and gives matched defects. - In the normal upright lung, V/Q is highest at the apex (~3) and lowest at the base (~0.6). Both ventilation and perfusion are greater at the base, but perfusion is more so.

**Clinical use** - Alternative to CTPA, which is the first-line imaging test for suspected PE. Use V/Q in pregnancy (lower breast radiation than CT), renal failure, contrast allergy, and young patients. - Best in patients with a normal chest X-ray and no significant underlying lung disease. - Diagnostic work-up: use Wells or PERC criteria for pretest probability. If low probability, get a D-dimer, and if it is negative, PE is excluded. If moderate or high probability, get CTPA (or V/Q if CTPA is contraindicated). If the patient is unstable, treat empirically and get bedside echocardiography. - Other uses: quantifying split lung function before lung resection or lung volume reduction surgery, and evaluating chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH). V/Q is more sensitive than CT for CTEPH, so it is the preferred screening test.

**Board pearls** - Classic stem: a pregnant woman or a patient with renal failure and sudden dyspnea, pleuritic chest pain, and tachycardia leads to a V/Q scan showing a mismatch. - Ventilation is normal and perfusion is decreased in PE. - A normal V/Q scan excludes PE. - Pulmonary angiography is the gold standard but is rarely used now. - Related findings of PE: S1Q3T3 on ECG, Hampton hump, Westermark sign, and elevated D-dimer (sensitive, not specific). - Treatment: anticoagulation (heparin, then DOAC or warfarin). Use thrombolytics for massive PE with hemodynamic instability.

Sources

  • First Aid for the USMLE Step 1 (Pulmonary: Pulmonary Embolism, V/Q mismatch)
  • Pathoma (Robbins) – Pulmonary Embolism
  • West's Respiratory Physiology: The Essentials
  • UpToDate: Diagnosis of acute pulmonary embolism
  • PIOPED II investigators, N Engl J Med 2006
  • 2019 ESC Guidelines on Acute Pulmonary Embolism

Reviewed by Medusa editorial — medical student review. Information here is for study reference only and is not medical advice. Spotted an error? Let us know.